🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive move to ban social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples around the globe. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and guardians are observing intently to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for other nations.

Across Europe Movement

In Europe, a growing group of countries are exploring comparable restrictions.

• The Danish government has announced a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister arguing that mobile devices and networks are "stealing our children's childhood". Legislation may be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is set to implement a age restriction of 15, citing the need to protect the young from the "influence of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a online verification tool to authenticate the identity and age of social media users. The media minister have suggested that an Australia-style ban could be "an options in reserve".
• In Spain, the prime minister has called on the legislature to pass a law increasing the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a related move, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The administration in The Netherlands has recommended families to restrict their children from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has passed a symbolic motion supporting a ban for under-16s except if a parent decides otherwise is given. While it cautions of the "addictive" quality of these apps, the move does not enact enforceable legislation.

"A strong age limit is a useful first step," said the parliamentarian driving the resolution.

Britain: A Watchful Eye

Across Britain, the government has remained open to a possible ban, arguing that "no measure is off the table" but insisting any policy must be "supported by strong research".

Last year, interest grew behind a proposal to introduce limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually modified. Instead, the government vowed to further research the issue.

Charities have voiced apprehensions. One foundation set up by the family of a teenager who died after encountering harmful online content suggests that a simple age ban could fail to protect children and could create a "sudden drop-off" of harm when young people reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a response to the failure of the Silicon Valley to design platforms and apps that are appropriate and age appropriate for young users," said a influential peer.

The US: A State-by-State Picture

Across America, action is primarily unfolding at the regional government level due to national inaction.

• Utah requires parental consent for under-18s to use social media and limits late-night use.
• The state of Florida has signed a bill prohibiting children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it faces court battles.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation capping minors to one hour of social media time per day, with any further use requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise passed bills requiring adult authorization for teenagers to set up social media presences.

Despite widespread concern and proposals from various figures to mimic Australia's lead, a nationwide ban is currently seen as unlikely.

International Perspectives

Apart from these regions, other nations are also considering moves.

• Malaysia plans to ban social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, world organizations strike a more measured tone. Unicef has advised that social media bans pose dangers and "could prove counterproductive". The agency notes that social networks can be a "vital connection" for isolated young people and that government action should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to invest in child safeguards.

As this international conversation unfolds, the steps of the Australian government and several other countries show that governments globally are less and less prepared to wait for platforms to self-regulate.